I’m releasing a new Professional Services Marketing Assessment. Here’s what makes it different and why it’s important.
Leaders who seek me out are frustrated with their marketing results. They don’t have enough leads; their brand lacks awareness; a competitor keeps flanking them; every practice has its own story and priorities, and the marketing team is either “too strategic” to get its hands dirty or “too tactical” to add strategic impact. Above all, the firm is not growing as fast as it needs to.
Firm leaders almost always think their “marketing problem” is a “Marketing function” problem.
Staff ineptness, website deficiencies, social media strategies, misallocated marketing budgets, the absence of brochures, lack of sales and marketing integration, CRM, or cross-selling demands are common complaints. Perhaps.
However, I’ve found that the “marketing problem” in most organizations is the result of organizational indecision or dysfunction. I call this imperfection the “BS of PS,” and it severely impacts marketing departments to the detriment of the firm.
I know this because I’ve developed sales and marketing strategies, built marketing organizations, and worked with leadership teams in every industry, discipline, market condition, and business scenario.
More often than not, each of the marketing shortfalls has a critical “upstream” strategic enabler that undermines the firm’s growth potential before it even gets to business development, marketing, and technology. The limitation occurs in one or more of the following areas:
- Culture: The firm does not reward the client centricity, sales prowess, or intellectual capital development behaviors properly, if at all.
- Market Focus: The film lacks focus (markets, clients, solutions) and allows its individual practices to race in opposite directions in pursuit of individual growth.
- Brand: The firm focuses on building awareness of its brand instead of its relevance.
- Core Capabilities: the firm narrowly defines its capabilities in terms of its functional discipline, instead of its client value and broader business acumen.
- Intellectual Capital: the firm does not differentiate its thinking, follows the herd, avoids the risk of stating an alternative POV or sets high expectations for intellectual capital development.
- Client Lifecycle: The firm has not identified an ideal client that values the value that the firm offers. Lacks understanding of the complex B2B buying cycle. It chases bad revenue and does not achieve economies of scale.
- Solutions: The firm’s solutions are firm-centric, not client-centric, are overly complex, difficult for the client to understand and buy confidently.
More than I care to admit over my career as a Marketing leader, I developed a long list of “right solution, wrong problem.” I’ve focused on brand problems that were really sales problems. I’ve replaced underperforming technologies that were actually hindered by cultural issues. I’ve implemented sales training when I should have focused on better client selection.
That’s why I’m sharing the assessment tool with my subscribers that helps identify and eliminate the barriers blocking your firm’s growth.
I call it the Growth Readiness Self-Assessment.
It measures critical areas of Marketing health—that’s Marketing with a capital “M.”
It is a powerful, intuitive tool built from my decades-long learnings and Prudent Pedal’s more comprehensive growth and marketing assessment methodology used to help leadership teams accelerate growth. This straight-forward assessment allows you to self-score your firm’s effectiveness in 11 critical growth-enabling areas, then, weights and prioritizes each area for attention.
With 2020 planning and budgeting kicking into high gear, I encourage you to download it and assess your firm as soon as possible. You’ll want to ensure that you’re attacking the areas that have the greatest impact on growth.
Please, don’t make your list of “right solution, wrong problem” as long as mine.